A list I made when asked what "one thing" I do to help the environment. (The idea being that if we all did just one small thing, the benefits could be huge.)
If too far to walk, I ride.
If too far to ride, or I need to take more people or gear, I drive an EV.
If too far for the EV, we drive a Prius.
Mostly commute by bike (to work, school and appointments).
The least efficient lighting in my home is compact fluorescent.
All regularly-used lighting is LED.
Whole house fan and open windows used in place of AC 90% of hot days.
Ceiling fans to remain comfortable in wider temp range.
AC not used below 80° interior temp.
Heat not used above 64° interior temp.
Cooking done outside on hot days.
Forced-exhaust, auto-ignition water heater. Only runs once per day.
Family showers all taken back to back (so to speak) to limit heat loss in pipes.
Manual recirculation pump to avoid dumping water while waiting for hot water.
Removing more of the original lawn every year. Replacing with natives.
Electric lawn mower.
All windows tinted.
All South windows have additional shade screens or awnings.
Shade trees on the south side of house.
PV system that covers house AND car electricity usage.
Water conserving faucets, showers and toilets.
Buy in bulk.
Buy local food.
Grow our own food.
Reuse and recycle wherever possible.
Compost all kitchen scraps and dog poop (separately!).
Energy star appliances.
Horizontal axis clothes washer.
Hang laundry to dry.
Cold water used for everything except showers and dish washing.
All wall warts unplugged when not used to prevent phantom loads.
Old wall warts replaced with electronic switching units for higher efficiency.
Irrigation is monitored and adjusted constantly to reduce waste.
Use bio cleaners and natural pest control.
Advocate for bicycle riding and Electric Vehicles.
Donate to charities and buy from companies that treat the earth right.
Make a hobby out of saving energy.
The Inflection Is Near?By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN - Published: March 7, 2009
Sometimes the satirical newspaper The Onion is so right on, I can’t resist quoting from it. Consider this faux article from June 2005 about America’s addiction to Chinese exports:FENGHUA, China — Chen Hsien, an employee of Fenghua Ningbo Plastic Works Ltd., a plastics factory that manufactures lightweight household items for Western markets, expressed his disbelief Monday over the “sheer amount of [garbage] Americans will buy. Often, when we’re assigned a new order for, say, ‘salad shooters,’ I will say to myself, ‘There’s no way that anyone will ever buy these.’ ... One month later, we will receive an order for the same product, but three times the quantity. How can anyone have a need for such useless [garbage]? I hear that Americans can buy anything they want, and I believe it, judging from the things I’ve made for them,” Chen said. “And I also hear that, when they no longer want an item, they simply throw it away. So wasteful and contemptible.”
Let’s today step out of the normal boundaries of analysis of our economic crisis and ask a radical question: What if the crisis of 2008 represents something much more fundamental than a deep recession? What if it’s telling us that the whole growth model we created over the last 50 years is simply unsustainable economically and ecologically and that 2008 was when we hit the wall — when Mother Nature and the market both said: “No more.”
We have created a system for growth that depended on our building more and more stores to sell more and more stuff made in more and more factories in China, powered by more and more coal that would cause more and more climate change but earn China more and more dollars to buy more and more U.S. T-bills so America would have more and more money to build more and more stores and sell more and more stuff that would employ more and more Chinese ...
We can’t do this anymore.
“We created a way of raising standards of living that we can’t possibly pass on to our children,” said Joe Romm, a physicist and climate expert who writes the indispensable blog climateprogress.org. We have been getting rich by depleting all our natural stocks — water, hydrocarbons, forests, rivers, fish and arable land — and not by generating renewable flows.
“You can get this burst of wealth that we have created from this rapacious behavior,” added Romm. “But it has to collapse, unless adults stand up and say, ‘This is a Ponzi scheme. We have not generated real wealth, and we are destroying a livable climate ...’ Real wealth is something you can pass on in a way that others can enjoy.”
Over a billion people today suffer from water scarcity; deforestation in the tropics destroys an area the size of Greece every year — more than 25 million acres; more than half of the world’s fisheries are over-fished or fished at their limit.
“Just as a few lonely economists warned us we were living beyond our financial means and overdrawing our financial assets, scientists are warning us that we’re living beyond our ecological means and overdrawing our natural assets,” argues Glenn Prickett, senior vice president at Conservation International. But, he cautioned, as environmentalists have pointed out: “Mother Nature doesn’t do bailouts.”
One of those who has been warning me of this for a long time is Paul Gilding, the Australian environmental business expert. He has a name for this moment — when both Mother Nature and Father Greed have hit the wall at once — “The Great Disruption.”
“We are taking a system operating past its capacity and driving it faster and harder,” he wrote me. “No matter how wonderful the system is, the laws of physics and biology still apply.” We must have growth, but we must grow in a different way. For starters, economies need to transition to the concept of net-zero, whereby buildings, cars, factories and homes are designed not only to generate as much energy as they use but to be infinitely recyclable in as many parts as possible. Let’s grow by creating flows rather than plundering more stocks.
Gilding says he’s actually an optimist. So am I. People are already using this economic slowdown to retool and reorient economies. Germany, Britain, China and the U.S. have all used stimulus bills to make huge new investments in clean power. South Korea’s new national paradigm for development is called: “Low carbon, green growth.” Who knew? People are realizing we need more than incremental changes — and we’re seeing the first stirrings of growth in smarter, more efficient, more responsible ways.
In the meantime, says Gilding, take notes: “When we look back, 2008 will be a momentous year in human history. Our children and grandchildren will ask us, ‘What was it like? What were you doing when it started to fall apart? What did you think? What did you do?’ ” Often in the middle of something momentous, we can’t see its significance. But for me there is no doubt: 2008 will be the marker — the year when ‘The Great Disruption’ began.